It should be interesting to note, writes Shawn William Byrd, that the middle school shooting did not involve a) an adult, and b) an elementary-aged school child. Also, it was an off-duty cop with a gun that saved the day.
No, this was not the gun, just a stock photo.
This will fade into the internet news void, because it is not the shooting du-jour. “We must do it for the children!”, shouts the uninformed and quick-reacting persons. What is this world coming to that the logical consequences from actions are not anticipated, especially those of a somewhat distant nature? Lame.
Sandy Hook may be a conspiracy, but this type of story here happens far more often, and a gun beat a gun. Plain and simple. Maybe the one kid had a beef with the other kid. Maybe he was just flippin’ nuts. Either way, the gun that could not be there by common citizen was there by virtue of the powers that be. The same powers that be who are intent on making sure we can’t be as prepared as them.
I guess the government did save us, after all. Bow down and kiss their feet. Oh wait, the shooter had already broken the law (many times over), so it didn’t matter. He was not a legal gun owner, so the rules did not make a difference, yet again!
Is there a code word In the Barack Obama Administration that we don’t appreciate, asks Shawn William Byrd? What of the word “Sandy”? There has been relatively little mentioned of it, perhaps it is a fluke, or maybe it really is a conspiracy. Sandy Cheeks doesn’t put up with any crap, and neither did the Superstorm Sandy or Adam Lanza at Sandy Hook. Of course, shooting up an elementary school doesn’t mean someone has balls of steel, just that they are effed up.
There are those that say HAARP is part of the weather conspiracy, and that the government introduced strength into Hurricane Sandy. Maybe. Do an internet search for the United States’ department of Weather Control. It exists. Some of the restrictions include weather manipulation, but also seismic weapons. Those are HAARP related, just ask the Soviets. Been going on for decades.
Sci fi stuff is around, technologically viable, and real. Voice-to-skull (those pesky internal voices), visual hypnosis, and remote viewing all exist. Check it out sheeple, if you don’t believe me.
Today, the 44th President of the United States was sworn in. But, I’m sure there was a lot of “swearing at” [the TV] going on. Shawn Byrd watched the private ceremony. Barack Hussein Obama repeated the oath of office, so it seems it was on the up-an-up. We were watching for something odd to happen during said swearing-in.
If the Inauguration goes well, the 44th President should have no problem with the public. He will, of course, try to distract those from things he believes should not be noticed. Quite a bit of fanfare and pageantry will be going into this tomorrow, so enjoy the show!
In closing, Shawn William Byrd and Barack Hussein Obama are not the same people, no matter what tin foil hats may say. Don’t believe the hype, it’s crazy out there.
So, was the CIA P2 analyst that was Nancy Lanza part of this Sandy Hook conspiracy? Shawn Byrd says it is possible. DARPA does many things besides “video game” stuff, so don’t believe all the hype. However, it is true that there are those involved in CIA/DOD/gov’t research do use others without their knowledge – including family.
Did you know there have been many attempts to make it illegal for the gov’t to conduct experiments on the general populace without their knowledge? Did you also know that the proposals keep getting denied/fail to pass? This is true in not only the U.S., but the EU as well. Check it out.
It should be noted that Adam Lanza was obviously not right in the head (mental illness?). There are a lot of theories floating around as to why he went about doing what he did. Shawn William Byrd doesn’t think any real reason will come to light. Why, says he?
There are too many discrepancies in the stories, videos, audio, interviews, and photos to make anybody believe with certainty of any particular motive. Most definitely, he obtained the weapons used illegally. The gun control debate appears to be the obvious reason, but only the insiders to this case know for sure. The truth will eventually filter down, but how long will it take? Maybe it won’t even make it that far. Time will tell.
It is a tragedy when children are killed, cold and calculated, anytime.
There is no shortage of evidence that this transpired, however, there is still no clear and convincing stories that make this a straight open-and-shut case of a crazy man on a rampage.
This is an op-ed, so jump down your own throat if you take issue with this. I’m going a little tin foil hat, but really, think for yourself.
Where are all the locals being interviewed, as has happened elsewhere? Don’t know. Why all the changes in officials’ stories? Don’t know. The government has it’s ways, but many don’t want to see it. I am not advocating anything, just be a little more critical of the media and it’s information [or disinformation].
That is all.